Commercial banks have identified high risks, weak infrastructure, and market uncertainties as major factors limiting lending to Nigeria’s agricultural sector despite growing calls for increased financing for farmers. The President of the Association of Corporate Affairs Managers of Banks, Rasheed Bolarinwa, told Sunday PUNCH that although banks recognise agriculture as critical to food security and economic growth, lenders remain cautious due to the peculiar nature of the sector.
“Banks are all agreed on the need to support agriculture to achieve self-sufficiency in food production. However, the challenge is more around the peculiarities of the agric business and the unique challenges within the sector. “Many banks are interested in agriculture because of its importance to the economy, but they are also cautious due to high-risk factors, repayment issues, operational risks, and market uncertainties,” he said.
Bolarinwa noted that agriculture remains one of the riskiest sectors for lenders because many of the challenges faced by farmers are beyond their control. “Agriculture is exposed to several risks that are often outside the borrower’s control. These include climate-related risks such as flooding or drought, pest and disease outbreaks, commodity price fluctuations, insecurity in farming communities, and weak infrastructure affecting storage and logistics,” he stated.
He explained that although intervention schemes such as the Agricultural Credit Guarantee Scheme Fund helped reduce risks for lenders, they did not completely shield banks from losses. “While the guarantee scheme helps to de-risk the risk factors, it does not eliminate risk.
Banks are still exposed to part of the loss, while recovery under guarantee schemes can sometimes be lengthy due to administrative constraints. Beyond credit risk, there are also operational and monitoring costs involved in agricultural lending, especially when dealing with dispersed smallholder farmers,” Bolarinwa said.
On the issue of collateral requirements, he maintained that banks had a responsibility to protect depositors’ funds and ensure prudent lending practices. “Banks have a responsibility to protect depositors’ funds, so credit decisions must balance financing risks with adequate mitigants and prudent risk management.
Traditional collateral remains important, especially where reliable financial records or alternative risk assessment tools are limited. Collateral also serves to ensure that farmers have skin in the game and remain committed to the orderly functioning and repayment of the loans,” he added.
The ACAMB president, however, said financial institutions were beginning to adopt alternative financing models for farmers without conventional collateral. “Yes, there is growing consideration for alternative credit models, although adoption is still evolving. Some financial institutions and ecosystem players are using value chain financing, warehouse receipt financing, aggregation-based lending, and cash flow-driven lending to support farmers who lack traditional collateral or formal credit history.
However, these models are still developing and have not yet fully replaced conventional collateral requirements across the industry,” he said. According to Bolarinwa, market volatility also continued to influence banks’ willingness to lend to agriculture. Related News Police summon SDP leaders over leadership crisis Banks, fintechs flag 82,143 transactions in one year – Report Oyo man dies after falling into soakaway “Market volatility significantly affects lending decisions because it impacts farmers’ revenues and repayment capacity.
Sharp movements in commodity prices, foreign exchange pressures, and inflation can quickly alter the economics of farming operations, making cash flow projections less predictable,” he explained. He further attributed the low share of agriculture in total bank lending to structural challenges within the sector.