ALMATY – Kazakhstan’s oil sector experienced a period of lower production in the first seven months of 2026, with production falling 8.9% to 53.2 million tons amid disruptions at the Tengiz field and the country’s main export route through the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC).
Yet the decline in production has not translated into a comparable fall in export revenues or broader economic activity, highlighting both the economy’s resilience and its continued vulnerability to oil infrastructure disruptions. According to data from the Bureau of National Statistics, oil and gas condensate production totaled 45.7 million tons in the first half of the year, down 8.4% year-on-year, while July output fell by 12%.
The temporary disruptions exposed a structural challenge for Kazakhstan’s energy sector. The CPC route accounts for more than 80% of the country’s oil exports, meaning problems affecting a single export corridor can quickly spread from logistics into production.
The January outage at Tengiz had already weighed heavily on first-quarter performance, while the July attacks on tankers near the CPC terminal created another constraint as production recovered. The impact was visible across the extractive economy. Mining and quarrying output declined by 4.4% in January-July, while pipeline freight turnover fell 2.9%.
Industrial production in the oil-producing Atyrau Region decreased by 7.8%. The decline was even sharper in some parts of the energy sector. Marketable gas production fell 23% to 12.2 billion cubic meters, while oil refining decreased 2% to 8.98 million tons. Coal was the exception, with production rising 12% to 58.9 million tons.
The most striking contrast is between oil production and Kazakhstan’s trade performance. Foreign trade turnover reached $71.8 billion in January-June, up 7.2% year-on-year. Exports increased 8.6% to $40.3 billion, while imports grew 5.4% to $31.5 billion. Oil and crude petroleum products remained the country’s largest export category, accounting for 46.5% of total export revenues, or approximately $18.8 billion.
This means Kazakhstan’s exports grew despite lower physical oil production. According to the data, June accounted for 82% of the total increase in exports during the first half, suggesting that higher prices and stronger shipments during that month helped offset earlier production losses.
The pattern demonstrates an important distinction: a decline in oil production does not automatically result in an equivalent decline in export revenue. Export earnings depend not only on volumes but also on prices, shipment timing and the ability to use available transport infrastructure.
However, the CPC disruptions also showed the limits of this resilience. When the consortium temporarily stopped receiving crude in July, Kazakhstan had to directly reduce production to prevent storage facilities from filling up. The disruptions have also renewed attention to Kazakhstan’s export diversification.
Experts say in the short term, there are no viable alternatives for Kazakhstan. Aruzhan Meirkhanova, a senior analyst at Outpost Eurasia, said the key task now is adaptation. “Existing routes cannot absorb comparable volumes, are more expensive and involve more complex logistics.