+86-156-2511-0166[email protected]WhatsApp
Hanheng Refractory
HOMEABOUT
PRODUCTS
All products
APPLICATIONS & INDUSTRIESMARKET SUPPORTNEWS
DISCUSS
Hanheng Refractory
HOMEABOUTAPPLICATIONS & INDUSTRIESMARKET SUPPORTNEWS
DISCUSS
+86-156-2511-0166WhatsApp[email protected]
Hanheng RefractoryHanheng RefractoryBuilt for heat. Proven in delivery.

Hanheng Refractory Materials Co., Ltd. supplies shaped bricks, monolithic refractories, tundish materials, and insulation products for steel, ferroalloy, glass, boiler, and other heat-intensive operations.

Quick links

  • Home
  • About
  • Products
  • Applications & Industries
  • Market Support
  • News

Core products

  • Magnesia-Carbon Brick
  • Alumina-Magnesia-Carbon Brick
  • Magnesia-Alumina-Carbon Brick
  • Al2O3-SiC-C Brick
  • Calcium-Magnesium-Carbon Brick

Contact

Panpan Road, Zhanqian District, Yingkou, Liaoning, Chinawww.hanhengref.com[email protected]+86-156-2511-0166WhatsApp

© 2026 Hanheng Refractory

Project discussionProduct system
Industry update
Published April 27, 2026climatecustomsexport

Crunch IMO Climate Talks Resume as Shipping Emissions Fight Intensifies

IMO heads into a pivotal round of negotiations in London this week, as its 84th Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 84) convenes...

Source-backed market reading focused on the local industrial developments, project signals, and operating consequences that are actually worth tracking.

Read Article
Previous article

The International Maritime Organization heads into a pivotal round of negotiations in London this week, as its 84th Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 84) convenes under the lingering shadow of last year’s stalled Net-Zero Framework and deep divisions over how to decarbonise global shipping.

While no final deal on the delayed climate package is expected at this stage, the meeting is widely viewed as a critical test of whether consensus can still be rebuilt on what would be the world’s first global carbon pricing system for an entire industry. Chaired by Liberia’s Harry Conway, the session marks the first gathering since governments voted in October to postpone adoption of the framework by a year, following a fraught 57–49 vote with 21 abstentions amid strong opposition from the United States and Saudi Arabia.

Negotiators now return to the issue under agenda discussions on greenhouse gas emissions from ships, with a hefty 57 submissions on the table, reflecting both the complexity and high stakes of the debate. A dedicated working group is expected to be established, alongside discussions on how to resume the extraordinary session where talks previously broke down.

Deliberations will be shaped by ongoing intersessional negotiations, which have continued technical work on key elements of the framework, including lifecycle fuel assessments and the scope of the IMO’s next greenhouse gas study. Observers say the meeting could begin to narrow gaps on contentious issues such as carbon pricing, revenue distribution and fuel-intensity rules, though divisions remain stark.

European states are pushing to preserve the framework’s pricing core, while Japan and parts of the shipping industry have floated alternative approaches, and the United States remains firmly opposed. Industry bodies including BIMCO, the International Chamber of Shipping and the World Shipping Council have warned that prolonged uncertainty risks delaying critical investment decisions, particularly around low- and zero-emission fuels, even as they reaffirm support for the IMO as the sector’s global regulator.

Beyond climate politics, the meeting carries a wide-ranging environmental agenda. Delegates are set to consider amendments to MARPOL Annex VI, including a proposal to designate the North-East Atlantic as an Emission Control Area for nitrogen oxides, sulphur oxides and particulate matter, a move that would significantly tighten regional emissions standards.

Further discussions will cover fuel consumption data reporting, operational carbon intensity, ballast water management, marine plastic litter, plastic pellet pollution, energy efficiency, air pollution prevention and underwater radiated noise. Taken together, the breadth of issues before MEPC 84 underlines its significance not only as a staging post in the battle over shipping’s Net-Zero Framework, but also as a forum shaping the wider environmental rulebook for global maritime trade.

Next article

Sources and reading line

Official releases and public references behind the argument in this article.

Evidence line
Published source

Crunch IMO Climate Talks Resume as Shipping Emissions Fight Intensifies

Source: Ships & Ports Nigeria RSS

Open source↗
Support note

Crunch IMO Climate Talks Resume as Shipping Emissions Fight Intensifies

Published source

Document: Ships & Ports Nigeria RSS · Source: Ships & Ports Nigeria RSS

Continue from here

Continue this article into market review, product systems, and project preparation.

When this signal is already affecting your buying sequence, continue from here into the related market page, product route, or a practical project discussion.

Related market pages

Continue into the country page when destination documents, packing, and delivery timing need a deeper read.

Nigeria industry and refractory demandOpen market page
Related product systems

Continue into the product systems that are most likely to appear in the same procurement discussion.

Alumina-Magnesia-Carbon BrickReview productAl2O3-SiC-C BrickReview productLightweight Microporous Magnesia BrickReview product
Project preparation

Share the unit, duty position, target campaign, destination market, and document questions so the next reply can stay practical.

Unit name, exact hot-zone position, and current lining route

Target campaign, shutdown or commissioning window, and expected quantity split

Destination market, delivery route, and the document set needed before quotation

Discuss this articleBack to News